HEALTH & SAFETY
Firefighters Association of New Jersey
International Association of Fire Fighters
April 29, 2009
Subject: PUBLIC HEALTH ADVISORY: SWINE FLU UPDATE
What is swine flu?
Swine Influenza (swine flu) is a respiratory disease of pigs caused by type A influenza viruses that causes regular outbreaks in pigs. People do not normally get swine flu, but human infections can and do happen. Swine flu viruses have been reported to spread from person-to-person, but in the past, this transmission was limited and not sustained beyond three people.
Are there human infections with swine flu in the U.S.?
In late March and early April 2009, cases of human infection with swine influenza A (H1N1) viruses were first reported in Southern California and near San Antonio, Texas. Other U.S. states have reported cases of swine flu infection in humans and cases have been reported internationally as well. An updated case count of confirmed swine flu infections in the United States is kept at http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/investigation.htm CDC and local and state health agencies are working together to investigate this situation.
Is this swine flu virus contagious?
CDC has determined that this swine influenza A (H1N1) virus is contagious and is spreading from human to human. However, at this time, it is not known how easily the virus spreads between people.
What are the signs and symptoms of swine flu in people?
The symptoms of swine flu in people are similar to the symptoms of regular human flu and include fever, cough, sore throat, body aches, headache, chills and fatigue. Some people have reported diarrhea and vomiting associated with swine flu. In the past, severe illness (pneumonia and respiratory failure) and deaths have been reported with swine flu infection in people. Like seasonal flu, swine flu may cause a worsening of underlying chronic medical conditions.
How does swine flu spread?
Spread of this swine influenza A (H1N1) virus is thought to be happening in the same way that seasonal flu spreads. Flu viruses are spread mainly from person to person through coughing or sneezing of people with influenza.
How can someone with the flu infect someone else?
Infected people may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 7 or more days after becoming sick. That means that you may be able to pass on the flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick.
What should I do to keep from getting the flu?
First and most important: wash your hands. Try to stay in good general health. Get plenty of sleep, be physically active, manage your stress, drink plenty of fluids, and eat nutritious food. Try not touch surfaces that may be contaminated with the flu virus. Avoid close contact with people who are sick.
Are there medicines to treat swine flu?
Yes. If you get sick, antiviral drugs can make your illness milder and make you feel better faster. They may also prevent serious flu complications. For treatment, antiviral drugs work best if started soon after getting sick (within 2 days of symptoms).
How long can an infected person spread swine flu to others?
People with swine influenza virus infection should be considered potentially contagious as long as they are symptomatic and possible for up to 7 days following illness onset. Children, especially younger children, might potentially be contagious for longer periods.
What can I do to protect myself from getting sick?
There is no vaccine available right now to protect against swine flu. There are everyday actions that can help prevent the spread of germs that cause respiratory illnesses like influenza.
What is the best way to keep from spreading the virus through coughing or sneezing?
If you are sick, limit your contact with other people as much as possible. Do not go to work or school if ill. Cover your mouth and nose with a tissue when coughing or sneezing.
What should I do if I get sick?
If you live in areas where swine influenza cases have been identified and become ill with influenza-like symptoms, including fever, body aches, runny nose, sore throat, nausea, or vomiting or diarrhea, you may want to contact their health care provider.
If you are sick, you should stay home and avoid contact with other people as much as possible to keep from spreading your illness to others.
If you become ill and experience any of the following warning signs, seek emergency medical care.
In children emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:
- Fast breathing or trouble breathing
- Bluish skin color
- Not drinking enough fluids
- Not waking up or not interacting
- Being so irritable that the child does not want to be held
- Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough
- Fever with a rash
In adults, emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:
- Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath
- Pain or pressure in the chest or abdomen
- Sudden dizziness
- Severe or persistent vomiting
Can I get swine influenza from eating or preparing pork?
No. Swine influenza viruses are not spread by food. You cannot get swine influenza from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork products is safe.
This is a rapidly evolving situation and guidance should be considered
interim and will be updated frequently.
For updates on what is going on in New Jersey go to the New Jersey
Department of Health and Senior Services webpage; http://nj.gov/health/.
CDC provides a website with questions and answers which has lots of useful
The CDC website will be providing daily updates regarding the status of the
swine flu investigation in the US. The web address is www.cdc.gov/swineflu.
In addition for your information, OSHA has pandemic flu information (http://osha.gov/dsg/topics/pandemicflu/index.html ) that may be of
Association Chartered 1929
W. Lafayette Street, Trenton, NJ 08608
*(O) 609-396-9766 * (F) 609-396-0891
* E-mail PFANJ@aol.com
Visit our Web Page at www.PFANJ.org
IOM RECOMMENDS RESPIRATORY PROTECTION GUIDLINES FOR HINI
IAFF - September 4, 2009 - The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has released its report on Respiratory Protection for Healthcare Workers against the novel H1N1 flu virus.
The IOM committee, citing increasing evidence that this disease can be transmitted through airborne pathways, recommends that the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines concerning respiratory protection for healthcare workers be followed and enforced.
“The IAFF is hopeful that this report will end the ridiculous debate once and for all that surgical masks provide respiratory protection," says IAFF General President Harold Schaitberger. Surgical masks were never intended to be respiratory protection, and should never be used for this purpose.”
Healthcare workers, which include fire fighters, paramedics and EMTs who provide pre-hosptial emergency medical care must be provided respirators for protection against airborne infectious diseases.
The IOM report reinforces this objective, which will now allow scientists and policy makers to finally move on to the more important issue of what level of respiratory protection is appropriate for the current threat of the novel H1N1 virus.
The IAFF recommendation remains that for protection against airborne infectious agents -- such as the novel H1N1 virus -- healthcare workers, including all fire fighters and emergency medical service personnel, must be provided with a P100 respirator as a minimum level of respiratory protection.
This recommendation is based on the fact that there is no permissible exposure limit for airborne infectious agents and is consistent with Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) guidelines on the selection and use of respirators. In addition, it's consistent with the California standard on Aerosol Transmissible Diseases, which now requires that paramedics and other emergency medical personnel in field operations be provided with and use a powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) with a High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter or a P100 respirator in lieu of a PAPR.
"Some policy makers have begun to downplay the IOM report because it does consider cost or feasibility issues," notes Schaitberger. "But the CDC should not make the cost of respiratory protection the limiting factor for protecting workers; it must recommend the protection that will most effectively protect the worker."
Supplies of respirators will likely be severely limited during a flu pandemic. For this reason, it is extremely important to correct this problem now, and not change guidelines to accommodate it.
Some detractors of the IOM report cite that healthcare workers can’t or won’t tolerate use of respirators for extended periods of time or that use of a respirator will compromise patient care. "When faced with the choice of wearing a respirator or becoming extremely ill or dying, we believe health care workers, including members of the IAFF, will adjust to properly wearing the required respirator.
Download the report.
IAFF Response to H1NI (swine) Flu Outbreak
The IAFF has developed policy and operational
recommendations for local, state and federal legislative and government
action that it encourages IAFF affiliates to use to communicate the need
to protect their members and the citizens they serve in the event of a
With the threat of a human-to-human
outbreak of the avian flu escalating, our challenge as all-hazard emergency
responders is to prepare now, before the flu reaches pandemic proportions,
says IAFF General President Harold Schaitberger.
The IAFF recommendations include
federal policy proposals for both the United States and Canada, as well
as guidelines for state, provincial and local IAFF affiliates involved
in policy and planning at those levels. In addition, the IAFF offers operational
suggestions for all fire fighters and emergency medical personnel in the
event of an influenza pandemic outbreak, along with full background information
and additional research resources. Click
here for a summary of the IAFF policy and operational recommendations.
here for a complete checklist of operational recommendations
and additional background information.
here to read the full text of the IAFF guidance on the
avian flu pandemic and other related information.
In response to a request from the fire service,
NIOSH is announcing the posting of a new web page titled, Fire Service SCBA Cylinder
Part Numbers, (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/firescbacylinder.html).
The page is a quick reference showing cylinder assemblies which are authorized
components of NIOSH-approved self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).
This posting lists the SCBA models commonly used in the fire service and the corresponding
approved cylinder and valve assemblies based on the information in the NIOSH data
base and provided by the manufacturer. Currently two manufacturers are listed,
Draeger Safety and Biomarine. Other manufacturers will be added as their
information is submitted to NIOSH for posting to this web page.
In general, this list contains the configurations thought to be most common, it
may not be comprehensive. The definitive source for information on the components
which make up an approved SCBA remains the approval label included in its user
instructions. You should refer to this label if there is any question.
Any questions or comments, please contact us at 412-386-4000 or 1-800-232-4636.
To contact NIOSH by e-mail, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Click Here - Important Safety Notice
Concerning SCOTT HUD Quick Disconnect Hoses.
Here - Important Safety Notice for all users of Scott NFPA 1981,
2002 Edition Self Contained Breathing Apparatus who received their SCBA or replaced
the low pressure hose on their SCBA after June, 2005
FIRE DANGERS MAY BE HIDDEN BENEATH YOUR FEET AT HOME
USER ALERT - MSA Air Mask Audi-Larm Coupling Nut Tightness
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PENNSYLVANIA AND HORIZON BC/BS, PENN MEDICINE REACH AGREEMENT
After months of difficult negotiations, The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia has just signed a contract extension through June 30, 2014 with Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. This means that New Jersey families who are insured by Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey will continue to have uninterrupted access to CHOP, and to our physicians at all of our New Jersey sites as well as our Philadelphia campus.
Since the surprising news of Horizon cancelling their contract with us last September, weve heard from hundreds of New Jersey families who were devastated to learn their ability to access CHOP after March 2009 was in question. We heard from many employees, too, and from scores of physicians, community coalitions, and even New Jersey legislators that Horizon needed to keep CHOP in its network of providers.
Many CHOP patient families offered their personal stories in newspaper articles and print advertisements. Hundreds of CHOP employees and New Jersey families wrote or called their legislators and wrote letters to their newspapers. There was an overwhelming groundswell of support, all of which contributed to this most positive outcome.
Important Safety Notice
Concerning SCOTT HUD Quick Disconnect Hoses
FF's FIT FOR DUTY - PLEASE WATCH !!
NIOSH RESPIRATOR APPROVALS TO BE REVOKED
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is issuing this notice to inform respirator users that Global Secure Safety Products., Inc. is no longer producing NIOSH- approved respirators or replacement parts and is not planning to resume production in the future. Global Secure Safety Products, Inc. stopped production of respirators in April 2008 and has ceased doing business.
Global Secure Safety Products, Inc. (formerly CairnsAir Inc. or Neoterik) Respirators will be listed on CEL as Obsolete and Certificates of Approval will be Revoked
NIOSH will revoke the approvals of these respirators on December 31, 2009. Revoked status means that the respirators in question will no longer be listed as NIOSH-approved respirators. Once revoked, respirators bearing these approval numbers may no longer be manufactured, assembled, sold, or distributed as NIOSH-approved respirators. Furthermore, they may not be used where NIOSH-approved respirators are required regardless of the current state of maintenance.
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) SETS NEW NATIONAL STANDARD FOR CO SCREENING BY PULSE CO-OXIMETRY
2008 NFPA 1584 establishes the routine use of Pulse CO-Oximetry
as a way to protect the lives of the nation’s firefighters from the dangers of CO Poisoning
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA – February 14, 2008 – Masimo (NASDAQ: MASI), the inventor of Pulse CO-Oximetry and Measure-Through Motion and Low Perfusion pulse oximetry, announced today that the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has made Carbon Monoxide (CO) screening by Pulse CO-Oximetry a new national healthcare standard for firefighters potentially exposed to Carbon Monoxide poisoning. NFPA’s consensus codes and standards serve as the worldwide authoritative source on fire prevention and public safety—with virtually every building, process, service, design, and installation in society today is affected by NFPA documents.
The new standard, which became effective December 31, 2007 and was published on January 31, 2008, establishes that “any firefighter exposed to CO or presenting with headache, nausea, shortness of breath, or gastrointestinal symptoms” must be measured for CO poisoning by Pulse CO-Oximetry or other available methods. It also requires every fire department to establish Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs) that outline uniform rehabilitation procedures for firefighters at incident scenes and training exercises.
Too often, even the most skilled first responders miss the chance to treat carbon monoxide poisoning early because, until Masimo invented Masimo Rainbow SET Pulse CO-Oximetry in 2005, there wasn’t a noninvasive way to detect elevated levels of CO in the blood. With the Masimo Rad-57 Pulse CO-Oximeter, fire fighters, EMS professionals and ER clinicians can easily detect carbon monoxide poisoning by applying a noninvasive LED-based sensor on the victims or themselves, allowing for prompt and possibly life-saving treatment that can also limit the likelihood of long-tern cardiac and neurological damage.
Studies have shown that even a single high level exposure, or prolonged exposure to low levels of CO, has the potential to cause long-term heart, brain and organ damage. Long-term effects of CO include: cardiac arrests, Parkinson-like syndromes affecting motor skills and speech, dementia, cortical blindness, acute renal failure, and muscle cell death.
“Often cited by attorneys within the legal system, NFPA standards represent complete industry consensus and are supported by a substantial amount of scientific or medical evidence,” said Mike McEvoy, EMS Director, Board of New York State Association of Fire Chiefs. "This new national standard adds considerable weight to growing industry guidance calling for CO screening by leading EMS, EMT and firefighter associations nationwide, including the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians (NAEMT), the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF), and the National Association of EMS Educators (NAEMSE).”
A worldwide leader in providing fire, electrical, building, and life safety to the public since 1896, NFPA’s mission is to reduce the global burden of fire and other hazards on the quality of life by providing and advocating consensus codes and standards, research, training, and education. NFPA's 300 codes and standards influence every building, process, service, design, and installation in the U.S. and many other countries. With a membership of more than 81,000 and over 80 national trade and professional organizations, NFPA is the authority on fire, electrical, and building safety. Copies of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Section 1584, Standard on the Rehabilitation Process for Members During Emergency Operations and Training Exercises, are now available through the NFPA.
Joe E. Kiani, Chairman and CEO of Masimo, stated “We applaud NFPA for making CO screening for firefighters a national standard with this latest revision of NFPA 1584 and for taking the lead in healthcare reform for all of North America’s firefighters. Establishing uniform standards is crucial to ensuring that the nation’s firefighters receive the proper care and attention required to help keep them safe, healthy and in peak condition to be able to meet the demands of their life-saving work. We are proud that our Pulse CO-Oximetry technology can play such a vital role within this standard and in the lives of our nation’s most heroic public servants.”
Masimo (NASDAQ: MASI) develops innovative monitoring technologies that significantly improve patient care—helping solve "unsolvable" problems. In 1995, the company debuted Measure-Through Motion and Low Perfusion pulse oximetry, known as Masimo SET, and with it virtually eliminated false alarms and increased pulse oximetry's ability to detect life-threatening events. Masimo SET is clinically proven in more than 100 independent and objective studies to provide the most trustworthy SpO2 and pulse rate measurements even under the most difficult clinical conditions, including patient motion and low peripheral perfusion. In 2005, Masimo introduced Masimo Rainbow SET, a breakthrough noninvasive blood constituent monitoring platform that can measure many blood constituents that previously required invasive procedures. Rainbow SET continuously and noninvasively measures Carboxyhemoglobin (SpCOTM) and Methemoglobin (SpMetTM), Pleth Variability Index (PVITM), in addition to Oxyhemoglobin (SpO2), Perfusion Index (PITM) and pulse rate, allowing early detection and treatment of potentially life-threatening conditions. Founded in 1989, Masimo has the mission of "Improving Patient Outcomes and Reducing Cost of Care by Taking Noninvasive Monitoring to New Sites and Applications." Additional information about Masimo and its products may be found at www.masimo.com.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations about future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, including: risks related to our assumption that inclusion in the new 2008 NFPA 1584 as a national standard will serve to substantially increase sales or revenues for the company and risks related to our assumption that the Masimo Rad-57 Pulse CO-Oximeter will deliver a sufficient level of clinical improvement over alternative CO monitoring devices to allow for rapid adoption of the technology at hospitals, fire and rescue, EMT and EMS units, as well as other factors discussed in the "Risk Factors" section of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2007. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know whether our expectations will prove correct. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to update, amend or clarify these forward-looking statements or the risk factors contained in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under the federal securities laws.
IAFF - A presumptive disability law is a law that links a particular occupation with a disease or condition that has been shown to be a hazard associated with that occupation. As a result of this linkage, if an individual employed in the occupation covered by the presumption contracts a disease or condition that is specified in the presumptive law, then that disease or condition is presumed to have come from that occupation. In this case, the burden of proof shifts from the employee to the employer to demonstrate that the condition was not in fact associated with the occupation but with another cause.
In the case of fire fighters and emergency medical responders, scientific evidence has demonstrated an increased risk for heart disease, lung disease, cancer, and infectious diseases. At this time, most of the U.S. States and Canadian Provinces have some form of presumptive law that applies to fire fighters and emergency response personnel. These laws vary greatly between different states and provinces.
The IAFF Division of Occupational Health, Safety & Medicine has accumulated a database of the current presumptive disability provisions in the US and Canada. To view the presumptive disability provision in your state or province, click on the link below then click on your particular state or province.
US and Canadian Presumptive Laws
NBC NIGHTLY NEWS - FIREFIGHTER SAFETY DEVICE FAULTY
NBC NIGHTLY NEWS - February 28, 2006 - 15 Firefighters have died in situations where their their pesonal safety alarm either failed to function or was inaudible. NBC's Peter Alexander reports on the fallourt from an MSNBC.com investigation.
Click here for a link to the video.
FLAWS FOUND IN FIREFIGHTERS' LAST LINE OF DEFENSE
U.S. waited 5 years to heed expert’s warning on ‘man down’ alarms
When New York City firefighter Thomas Brick was lost in this 2003 fire in a mattress warehouse, it took 30 minutes to find him. When he was turned over, his PASS alarm emitted a faint sound. Brick had been in the first class of recruits after Sept. 11.
MSNBC - February 9, 2007 - Worn by a million firefighters in the U.S., the PASS device is a motion sensor that makes an awful racket if a firefighter stops moving for 30 seconds while battling a blaze. It flashes its lights and lets loose a series of ear-splitting beeps — an urgent call to help a fallen comrade.
It’s a call that hasn't always been heard. Tests by federal and independent labs show that some PASS alarms can fail to perform as intended if they get too hot or wet — a serious problem for people who rush into burning buildings with water hoses. And federal investigative reports reviewed by MSNBC.com show that 15 firefighters have died since 1998 in fires where a PASS, or Personal Alert Safety System, either didn't sound or was so quiet that rescuers weren't given a chance to find the firefighter quickly.
Documents made public under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that nine of those deaths came after the federal government blocked an investigation by its own expert into possible failures of PASS alarms and other firefighting equipment. A manager for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the federal agency that is charged by Congress with investigating firefighter deaths, ordered an agency fire safety engineer on Feb. 14, 2000, to "minimize your fact gathering during investigations" and to restrict his investigations to issues relevant "for the prevention of future similar events."
On the same day that the CDC manager instructed the agency's fire safety engineer to scale back his investigation, Houston firefighter Kim Smith had become lost in a pre-dawn fire in a McDonald's restaurant.
Hearing no beeps from her PASS alarm, and seeing no flashing lights, her comrades searched for two hours before finding her body.
If a firefighter dies, it's a good funeral’
Nine more times, the rituals of a firefighter's funeral — a fire truck bearing the flag-draped casket; the bagpipers playing "Will Ye No Come Back Again?" — were re-enacted before the CDC took action, calling finally in April 2005 for higher standards for testing PASS alarms.
Kim Smith and a second firefighter, Lewis Mayo, didn't emerge from the blazing McDonald's when the evacuation order was given. She died on Feb. 14, 2000, the same day that the CDC engineer was told not to waste his time on equipment problems.
“Fire departments give good funerals," said Richard M. Duffy, the health and safety chief for the International Association of Fire Fighters.
"We never did investigations to the extent that they were needed … but we did some very, very good funerals. If a cop dies, it's a crime scene. If a firefighter dies, it's a good funeral."
After the CDC’s warning, tests quickly demonstrated that temperatures commonly encountered by firefighters could hurt the performance of at least some PASS alarms.
Tests in a convection oven at the National Institute of Standards and Technology found a problem with the two models it tested: The volume of the beeping diminished substantially at temperatures as low as 300 degrees Fahrenheit — the sort of temperatures that firefighters encounter in a room next to a fire. Researchers said they believe that all of the half-dozen or so brands of PASS alarms on the market would be similarly affected.
In addition, some PASS devices made by at least three manufacturers have had problems over the past decade with water leaking into the electronics or battery compartments, causing them to either beep continually or stop working altogether, according to interviews and documents reviewed by MSNBC.com.
Later this week, a tougher new standard for testing PASS devices in heat and water will be issued by the National Fire Protection Association. But manufacturers say it will be months before an improved device is on the market. And even when new models are available, there is no plan for recalling the old ones, so fire departments may have to bear the cost of replacing them.
Meanwhile, the approximately 1 million professional and volunteer firefighters across the nation will rely on the older PASS alarms as their last line of defense.
Precise role in fatalities is unclear
No one can say for sure that a PASS device caused any of the 15 deaths in which the alarms weren’t heard. And it's impossible to say that any firefighter would necessarily have survived if the PASS alarm had been seen and heard.
James Cheng / MSNBC.com
The controls for a PASS device
Firefighting is dangerous even when done right. But firefighter fatalities usually involve a series of mistakes: inadequate staffing or training; firefighters working alone instead of in pairs; an incident commander's mistake in evaluating the risk. The PASS device is intended to give firefighters who are injured, trapped or just lost in the smoke a chance to survive such miscues.
It is required to shriek for an hour at 95 decibels so it can be heard over the roar of the fire and the cacophony of chain saws cutting, exhaust fans blowing, glass breaking and water flowing.
"It sends a chill up your spine," Kenneth R. Willette, the fire chief in Concord, Mass., said of the alarm’s piercing cry. "You know that means someone is in trouble. So until you can locate that person, your heart is racing and all you can think about is finding that person."
The first generation of PASS alarms, which were introduced in the early 1980s, had a human problem: Annoyed when the device started beeping when they stood still on a break, many firefighters would just not turn them on.
So the National Fire Protection Association set a standard requiring that the device be armed automatically when a firefighter turns on the air supply. These so-called "integrated PASS devices" are built into the self-contained breathing apparatus. When the firefighter is motionless — usually for 30 seconds — they first sound a gentle beep, the pre-alarm signal, then ramp up to the full alarm. That's why, at a fire, bystanders will often see firefighters waggling their hips. They're not dancing. They're telling the PASS, "I'm still alive."
In exchange for that annoyance, firefighters rely on the devices to work when they need them. And they usually do. Manufacturers say that hundreds of firefighters have been saved by PASS devices.
Devices silent, or just too quiet
The stories of the 15 who were not saved are contained in reports by the CDC's Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program. Each firefighter was wearing an automatic PASS alarm. In 12 of the 15 cases, nothing was heard; in three cases, the sound was muffled by the firefighter lying on the device and could be heard only when rescuers found the victim and rolled him over, according to the CDC's reports.
In November 2000 in Pensacola, Fla., firefighter Maurice Bartholomew got lost trying to leave a house fire. Firefighters searched for an hour before finding him in a kitchen at the back of the house. His PASS alarm wasn't heard or seen at all.
In March 2002 in Jefferson City, Tenn., volunteer firefighter Shane Murray was trapped in a house fire. He was found after 18 minutes just 5 feet from the door. His PASS device was beeping, but not loud enough to be heard while he was lying on it.
And in May 2002 in St. Louis, firefighter Rob Morrison's PASS alarm was not heard or seen for 20 minutes while he was injured inside a refrigeration company fire. Firefighter Derek Martin went looking for Morrison at the wrong end of the building and got lost. Both men died.
"I just can't believe that this was happening a number of times and no one was told about it," said Morrison’s widow, Laura. "I mean, Rob didn't know. None of the firemen knew."
Eric R. Schmidt didn't know for sure that PASS devices were malfunctioning, but he suspected that there was a recurring problem with the alarms.
Engineer's warning ignored
Schmidt went to work for the CDC in 1999 as the first fire protection engineer in the firefighter fatality program in Morgantown, W.Va. In 1998, Congress gave the CDC the responsibility for investigating firefighter deaths and searching for lessons that could prevent additional fatalities. The CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, or NIOSH, was given responsibility for the program.
Documents provided by the CDC show that Schmidt was investigating a December 1999 fire in Keokuk, Iowa, where three firefighters died along with the three children they had been trying to save. The firefighters had been wearing two PASS devices apiece — one that is armed only if a firefighter turns it on, and the integrated alarm that is switched on automatically. Schmidt thought it was strange that none of the dozen other firefighters on the scene recalled hearing the alarms, so he wanted to collect the tape recordings from the dispatch center to see if the sounds could be heard there.
“I’m saying, the math here is astonishing," Schmidt told MSNBC.com, describing his conversation with his supervisors at the CDC. "The chance of having a dozen deaf firefighters is astronomical."
Schmidt also knew that in New York City in 1998, no one had heard the PASS alarms of two firefighters who died in a high-rise apartment fire. A third firefighter died in the same fire, but his PASS sounded. That information was in the CDC unit's investigative report on that fire, issued in August 1999.
"I can’t tell you I understood what the failure pattern was,” Schmidt said. “All I could tell you is, something is not adding up. This needs more attention. Let’s go back and listen to the tapes. They said, ‘We don’t want to listen to the tapes.’”
On that Valentine's Day morning in 2000, the head of the firefighter program, Dawn Castillo, gave Schmidt a memo labeled "performance guidelines."
First, she reminded Schmidt that he was still on probation as a new employee, and would need to improve his performance to keep his job.
Then she urged him to stop wasting his time asking for evidence such as dispatch tapes.
She criticized his "persistence in gathering complete autopsy reports"; just getting the cause of death by phone was sufficient, she said.
And she told Schmidt he didn't need to gather details such as the measurements of a fire hose that had burned through, or information on firefighters' protective jackets, which he thought had been recalled by the manufacturer.
‘Minimize your fact gathering’
Castillo offered four reasons for Schmidt to scale back his investigations:
"The collection of detailed information not of likely use in an investigation is an inefficient use of your time."
It's "a burden on those who help us in gathering the facts of the case."
It's "a potential liability to the program if those who spend their time helping us to understand the case are upset by the absence of information that they helped provide in the summary report."gu
Any information that is gathered could be requested from the CDC by others. The agency does not identify individuals in its reports.
"You need to minimize your fact gathering during investigations," Castillo wrote, "to those pieces of information which are needed to summarize the chain of events or that have direct implications for prevention recommendations."
The memo was hand-delivered just as fire departments around the country were lowering their flags to half staff.
Earlier that morning, in southwest Houston, 30-year-old Kim Smith had been about to end her 24-hour shift. She planned to spend the rest of Valentine's Day with her fiancé.
But at 4:33, a fire alarm awakened the crew in Fire Station 76: There was a fire at a McDonald's.
She was one of the first firefighters to rush into the restaurant. Attached to her air supply was a PASS device made by Scott Health & Safety, the U.S. market leader in self-contained breathing apparatus.
She and firefighter Lewis Mayo, 44, took a hose line into the kitchen for a "fast attack" on the fire. She'd done this many times, and had won regional competitions for her firefighting skills and endurance.
Inside the McDonald's, the heat became intense and 30-foot flames were shooting out of the roof. At 4:52 a.m., the chief ordered everyone to evacuate, but Smith and Mayo didn't emerge from the inferno. They had been buried by a ceiling collapse.
A PASS device was heard. It was Mayo's, and he was found alive, though he later died at the hospital.
But Smith's PASS was never heard, the CDC found. It took two hours to find her body in the debris, just 6 feet from the door. Police discovered later that burglars had set the fire.
Fired for ‘marginal’ performance
Four months after the double-fatality fire in Houston, Schmidt was fired by Castillo in June 2000 for "marginal" performance. Castillo wrote in his termination letter that he was not a good team player, was inefficient, and spent time gathering information "of questionable utility and necessity." She cited especially the delay waiting for the dispatch tapes in the Iowa fire. The program didn't replace him, and hasn't had a fire engineer since, she told MSNBC.com.
But Schmidt didn't drop the equipment issues. He wasn’t just an engineer, but also a former fire captain in Prince George's County, Md., with 20 years of experience in the fire service. On Oct. 2, 2000, he wrote to Dr. Linda Rosenstock, the director of the CDC's NIOSH agency.
Schmidt asked Rosenstock to look into the issues of firefighter equipment so more firefighters wouldn't die. He highlighted three instances where he was told not to investigate: the fire hose that failed; the firefighter coats that may have been recalled; and the PASS devices, which he called "another issue that warrants further investigation."
"This is but only one example," he wrote of Castillo's performance guidelines, "where the managers of this program in Morgantown repeatedly instruct staff to omit critical facts because of ‘potential liability to the program.’ These managers have shown little, if any regard, for the fact that fire fighters will continue to actually suffer injuries and death in part because NIOSH fails to document critical aspects of these incidents."
Rosenstock is no longer at the CDC. She was in her last month in government when Schmidt's letter arrived. Now the dean of the UCLA School of Public Health, she declined to be interviewed by MSNBC.com, but sent word through a spokeswoman that she doesn't remember Schmidt’s letter.
Castillo told MSNBC.com that the CDC took no action in response to the letter, because Schmidt didn't provide any new information beyond what they had already discussed.
"Although PASS devices were one issue that he addressed in his letter, in passing, that letter did not provide any additional documentation to substantiate his concerns," Castillo said.
She said no additional documentation was requested.
"No, no one acted upon it," she said, "because there was nothing substantive to act upon."
Manager: No valid areas of inquiry blocked
Castillo said she had not blocked any valid areas of inquiry, but didn't want Schmidt to get sidetracked by nonessential issues. To be able to investigate deaths with limited funds, she said, investigators had to limit themselves to the factors that led to deaths, not to follow trails on other safety issues of uncertain value.
In the Iowa fire, she said, the firefighters wouldn't have survived the extreme heat of a flashover, or sudden ignition of a room — even if their fire hose had held, or their coats had not been recalled, or the PASS alarms had been heard.
"We reported that the PASS did not appear to be heard," Castillo said. "Did we follow up and do additional testing? We did not. Do we have the resources to go down every single path? We do not. Do we generally tell people not to follow up on promising leads? Absolutely not."
Citing a computer simulation of the Iowa fire, Castillo said the temperatures reached 1,100 degrees F, which she said was not survivable and in which no PASS device could be expected to operate. The national standard for PASS devices, however, has since 1998 included a flashover simulation: 1,500 to 2,100 degrees for 10 seconds.
After Schmidt was fired, the CDC released its investigative report on the Iowa fire in April 2001. One of its recommendations is curious: Instead of recommending that PASS alarms be tested, it stated that firefighters should use PASS alarms. But as another section of the report makes clear, all three firefighters were wearing their automatic alarms, and they were not heard.
Schmidt said he thinks one cause of his disagreements with Castillo was a difference in perspective. He is an engineer and a firefighter. She's an epidemiologist and specialist in child labor, who won her agency's top award in 2004. He said she just didn't respect the value of personal protective equipment, because child workers aren't allowed in jobs where such gear is used. But firefighters can't control their work environment -- they go where they're called. That's why they rely on helmets, hoods, gloves, boots, bunker pants, coats and face masks.
"She would say, 'The room flashed over. How could anybody have survived?'” he said. “I said, 'Well, firefighters have survived flashover. You're going to be in the burn ward for a period of time, but firefighters have survived flashover.'"
Other opportunities missed
As the years passed, the CDC missed other chances to look into PASS alarms.
In May 2001 in Passaic, N.J., firefighter Alberto Tirado was hunting for children in a fire. Rescuers entered the building three times trying to find him, and only when they turned him over could they hear a faint PASS alarm.
Back at the CDC lab, Tirado’s PASS device wouldn't sound its alarm, but the technician who ran the test didn’t pursue the matter, because the agency does not certify the alarms.
Nor did he send it to the Safety Equipment Institute, which does certify that the devices meet the standards set by the fire prevention association.
"The PASS device did not function," the technician wrote in the final report. "I made no attempt to determine why the device failed to activate. Because NIOSH does not test or certify PASS devices, no further testing or evaluations were conducted on the PASS unit."
One reason the CDC didn't focus on PASS alarms, Castillo told MSNBC.com, is that its mission is to focus on the factors that get firefighters into trouble — more than the factors that might help get them out of trouble. She called the PASS devices "tertiary," or of third rank or importance.
"When we are doing our investigation, we are focusing on those things that we feel — that we find, through our investigation process, have the greatest role in resulting in that firefighter's death," Castillo said. "The PASS device is a last resort."
Schmidt argues that it’s impossible to determine what's important without investigating. In agreeing to discuss his personnel file, he said, he doesn't want all the focus to be on PASS devices.
"My point for doing all this is, I want to make sure there’s a process in place to identify sentinel events, so investigators don’t have to fight tooth and nail to identify something, which may be a hunch.
"In 2000, when I wrote my letter, it was something that was odd, that I was trying to tell them. They said, ‘Don’t worry about that.’
"If you’re doing a scientific investigation," Schmidt said, "you have to write down these hunches, because if you get them two or three times, you’ve got a problem. ... Within 90 days of documenting a sentinel event, put something out to the fire service."
2003 death triggers a warning
It wasn’t until after a 2003 death, Castillo said, that the CDC concluded that PASS devices had a problem.
Even then the CDC took more than a year to issue a warning to the fire prevention association.
New York Daily News
Firefighter Thomas Brick of Ladder #36 of the Inwood section of Manhattan, who died in December 2003 while fighting a four-alarm fire. His PASS alarm appeared to have shorted out.
In the Inwood section of New York City on Dec. 16, 2003, firefighter Thomas Brick was lost in a fire in a mattress warehouse. It took 30 minutes to find him. When he was turned over, his PASS alarm emitted a very low sound of the sort associated with an electrical short.
Brick had been in the first class of recruits after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Brick's death, Castillo told MSNBC.com, "was the first in which our investigators had direct evidence that typical exposure to heat at the scene of a fire might adversely affect a PASS device."
Although the CDC team made its visit to the fire scene on Jan. 26, 2004 — 41 days after Brick's death — the agency waited another 450 days — until April 20, 2005 — to ask the National Fire Protection Association to consider toughening the tests for PASS alarms.
In that period, two more firefighters died in fires where rescuers couldn't find them:
|Baytown Fire Rescue
Firefighter Nito Guajardo died in 2004
in Baytown, Texas. His PASS alarm wasn't heard.
Firefighter Steve Fierro died in Carthage, Mo., on Feb.18, 2004. Unaware that Fierro was near the front of the building, the rescue team was searching at the rear. It took about 43 minutes to find him.
Firefighter Nito Guajardo died in Baytown, Texas, on Dec. 20, 2004. He was found after a 15-minute search, about 15 feet from the door.
"It was gut wrenching," said Schmidt, the former CDC engineer. "I mean it was very difficult to hear that additional firefighters were dying."
To try to figure out what was going wrong, the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md., put two models of PASS alarms into its oven.
When heated first to room temperature, about 73 degrees F, both PASS devices beeped at about 86 decibels, roughly as loud as a Mack truck driving past at a distance of just 3 feet.
But when heated to 392 degrees, the PASS devices sounded at only 72 decibels, only as loud as a busy restaurant. (The decibel scale is logarithmic, so a drop of 14 decibels represents a substantial decrease in volume.)
"One of the tricky things is, the volume decreases, but when it cools down, it comes back," said Nelson Bryner, leader of the firefighting technology group that oversaw the tests.
"If a firefighter goes down, the noise generator may not have worked. But once the fire is out, now it's working. One is led to believe that the PASS worked the whole time."
The scientists won't reveal which companies made the two PASS devices that were tested, but in fire protection association committee meetings, manufacturers agreed that all the PASS devices now on the market use essentially the same technology to sense motion and sound the alarm.
But heat is only part of the problem.
The hair dryer treatment
Under the national standard since 1998, PASS devices must be able to withstand immersion in water for two hours, and even work after a dunk for 5 minutes with the battery compartment left open.
Since 2000, however, Dallas firefighters have been using hair dryers to dry out the battery and electronics compartments of their PASS devices, according to the department's safety officer. The water causes the devices to beep constantly, and firefighters fear that it might cause them not to sound at all when needed, a Dallas fire chief said.
"I'm embarrassed to say that's how we were addressing the problem, but the hair dryers worked," said the safety officer for Dallas Fire-Rescue, Battalion Chief Ray Reed.
He said the city is pressing the issue with the manufacturer, Scott Health & Safety, which is a division of Tyco International Ltd.
If he didn't serve on a national committee for the fire protection association, Reed said, he wouldn't have known that other departments were having similar issues.
A spokeswoman for Scott said the company is working closely with Dallas to resolve the problem, but wouldn't give any details.
A second manufacturer, Mine Safety Appliances, sent out a user advisory in November 2001 describing a problem that caused about 2 percent of its PASS devices to beep continuously. Some of those incidents were caused by water, the company said. The advisory attributed the problem to screws that have become loosened over time, and said it could be fixed by using different screws and adding waterproof glue.
Company remained mum on water leaks
No such alert was sent out by a third manufacturer, Survivair Respirators, although executives have testified that from 5 percent to 20 percent of its PASS alarms suffered from water leaks.
That information emerged in response to a lawsuit filed by the families of St. Louis firefighters Rob Morrison and Derek Martin, who died in the refrigeration company fire in 2002.
Morrison’s PASS alarm was not heard, and he was found only when a searcher stepped on him.
Martin's PASS alarm did work, but he became lost while searching for Morrison. Both firefighters were alive when they were found, but died within a day.
In the two-week trial of the Morrison family’s lawsuit in September, attorneys for Survivair disputed the claim that his PASS failed. The company argued that there were three innocent possibilities: Morrison had been moving the entire time he was lost, or for some reason he might have reset his PASS — in effect turning off the alarm — or it could have sounded but not been heard.
None of the firefighters hunting for Morrison testified that they heard his PASS alarm during the 20 minutes he was lost.
Executives of Survivair of Santa Ana, Calif., a company founded by Jacques Cousteau that is a division of the French company Bacou-Dalloz, testified that the problem of "leakers" was identified in 1997 or 1998, before its PASS device moved from preproduction to its first sale. Changes to address the problem continued at least until 2003, or a year after the St. Louis fire.
Complaints poured in from dozens of fire departments, the executives testified. About 300 out of 1,500 PASS devices sold to the Los Angeles Fire Department were returned to the company, determined to be leaking and replaced, testified James Beckstead, the company’s Western regional sales manager.
There was conflicting testimony from Survivair on the effect of the water leaks. Senior executives said that the device was designed with a fail-safe feature that would cause it to sound constantly if water got inside, making firefighters aware of the malfunction. But two company engineers testified that sometimes the devices wouldn’t sound an alarm at all if water got into the electronics.
‘We don't deem it a safety issue’
"No sound, no lights ... nothing," testified Duane Decker, the former Survivair mechanical engineer in charge of fixing the leaks. "It was determined that if water got in, sometimes they would not work."
Decker described making a series of changes: the cover was redesigned, to reduce the number of places where water could enter; a sealant was added to the cover gasket during assembly; then designers tried only the sealant with no gasket; as well as extending the coating on the circuit board to provide more protection. The company also began dunking every PASS device in water, not just a sample of them as before. But it did not call back the ones in the field for a dunking.
The St. Louis Fire Department, which bought its Survivair PASS devices in 1999, received no warning of the problem.
From the testimony of James Beckstead, the Western regional sales manager:
Q. You've said there was no recall. You've also said that there was no calling the PASS devices in for testing that were out there in the field. Was there any kind of a warning sent, a warning letter or call made, to fire departments that had the devices that were not water tested — about, "Hey," along the lines, "we've found a leakage problem, and be on the lookout," or anything like that?
A. Not that I recall.
Q. Any particular reason why not?
A. The only reason we would not do that is we don't deem it a safety issue.
Q. This is a life-saving device, isn't it?
A. It's a component of a life-saving device.
Executive: ‘The word was out there’
Survivair's senior executive, Jack Bell, testified there was no need for a warning, because firefighters knew about the water problem: "The word was out there, whether we formally told everyone — rumors or some way."
The lawyers disagreed on whether the CDC tested Morrison's PASS device, and what that test showed. The company said that the CDC tested Morrison's PASS device more than 100 times, and it worked perfectly. The CDC report on Morrison’s and Martin's death says that both PASS devices worked in a simple test, but that they were not subjected to more rigorous tests to determine if they met the national standard — again, because the CDC does not certify that equipment. Even in the simple test, the lawyer for the Morrison family argued, the video shows 3 minutes when the device failed to alarm.
And when an independent lab dunked Morrison's PASS device in water during testing to determine if it met the national standard, and then opened it in front of lawyers and a video camera, water spilled out of the electronics compartment.
"There isn't strong enough language to condemn how they handled this," the lawyer for the Morrison family, Daniel Finney Jr., of St. Louis, told MSNBC.com. "They were selling their products as lifesaving devices when they knew they were fatally flawed. They were selling them as a firefighter's lifeline, and they knew they could very well fail him in that situation, and they didn't tell anyone. It would be like selling parachutes when you know that they don't open one out of five times, and not telling anyone."
The company's vice president and general manager, Jack Bell, sent a statement to MSNBC.com in response to Finney's statement: "Survivair completely and unequivocally denies his false, factually unsupported and reckless charges. The evidence supporting Survivair’s position in this litigation is compelling. … Survivair’s equipment was not at fault."
A secret 11th-hour settlement
The jury never reached a conclusion. It was deliberating when Survivair and the Morrison family agreed to a settlement. The company admitted no fault and did not agree to make any changes or send out a warning, but it did pay an undisclosed amount to the Morrison family. A separate lawsuit by Derek Martin's family is headed to trial in April.
Meanwhile, St. Louis firefighters are still wearing the same model PASS device that Morrison wore.
Armed with the oven tests, and with testimony from the widows of Martin and Morrison, the National Fire Protection Association approved a tougher standard for PASS alarms in December. The standard, which is scheduled to be published on the association’s Web site on Friday, requires a series of tests showing the PASS alarm can withstand being heated, dunked in water, and tumbled in a dryer, according to a summary provided by the association.
The maximum temperatures the devices are required to withstand in the new test are no higher than in the old test: 500 degrees Fahrenheit for five minutes, then 1,500 to 2,100 degrees for 10 seconds in the flashover test. But it does require that the PASS device produce a sound after some of the torture tests; the old standard just required it not to melt or catch on fire.
The new standard also adds a "muffle test." The alarm will have to be more powerful so it can be heard if a firefighter falls on it.
Some manufacturers told the association that the new heat standard can't be met.
But the largest manufacturer of PASS alarms, Scott, says it will have a device to meet the new standard by this summer, when old inventory can no longer be sold.
Who will pay for replacements?
As for the more than one million U.S. firefighters with the old devices, their fire departments may have to pay for new ones, which cost about $200 apiece. It's not clear that any agency has authority to order a recall of the old ones:
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission says it doesn't have a role, because a firefighter's equipment isn't considered a consumer product.
The National Fire Protection Association says that its standards are voluntary, that responsibility to enforce those standards rests with the Safety Equipment Institute, or SEI, another nonprofit, which certifies devices as meeting the standard.
And SEI says that only the manufacturers can decide whether or not to recall the old devices.
"From what I understand, the manufacturer is the only one who can pull the trigger on a recall," said Stephen R. Sanders, the institute’s technical director. "We can influence whether or not a manufacturer does a recall. But they might look at us and say, ‘You're crazy.’"
The institute raised concerns several times about Survivair PASS alarms failing its random tests, but accepted the company's assurances that it was an isolated problem, or had been fixed, documents introduced in the Morrison trial show.
For Rob Morrison's widow, who comes from a firefighting family in St. Louis, the lack of accountability is baffling.
"I just couldn't figure that out," Laura Morrison said, "when firemen are giving their lives everyday to help the community and save people — and companies knew about this and never told anybody what the problem was, and let them, still today, go into a burning building not knowing if their PASS device is going to work or not."
LUXFER GAS CYLINDER SAFETY ALERT
IAFF - January 4, 2007 - In May 2006, the IAFF alerted its membership to a U.S. Department of Transportation notice concerning Luxfer composite cylinders that may not have been properly autofrettaged or hydrostatically tested by the third-party inspector, Arrowhead Industrial Services, Inc. Transport Canada has also issued a similar statement concerning non-compliant SCBA cylinders in Canada.
Fire departments using any of the cylinders listed in the Federal notice must immediately discontinue use of the cylinders and return them to Arrowhead for autofrettage and hydrostatic testing. Owners of these cylinders are legally required to comply with these government requirements.
The serial numbers of all affected SCBA cylinders are now available at in a special database that will automatically and quickly check serial numbers and determine which cylinders, if any, require testing. Every affected cylinder must be removed from service immediately and sent in for testing.
Call 1-800-355-3156 to arrange for a customer service representative to test your cylinders and return them to you promptly at no charge.
If removing cylinders from service creates a hardship for you or your department, the customer service representative can also arrange to provide loaner cylinders at no charge while your cylinders are being tested.
Click here for the full Luxfer notice and here for the USDOT Federal Register posting.
FIREFIGHTERS FACE NEW HAZARD
KDSK - December 6, 2006 - Firefighters put their lives on the line day in and day out, but now there's a new hazard that's putting them even more at risk.
It's a type of floor construction that burns and falls apart faster than traditional floors, and it's found in more than half of all new homes. The structural components often burn through so quickly, firefighters can't get out in time and end up falling right through the floor.
That is exactly what happened during a house fire on March 30 in St. Charles. A woman was trapped and there was a problem.
Firefighter Chris Blackwell says just a few feet inside the doorway, the floor was actually gone.
A small section burned, and the rest began to cave. Firefighters carrying the victim actually tumbled eight feet to the basement below. Fortunately other crews were waiting.
"They noticed us coming down and more or less broke our fall -- one of my crew member's fall and our victim's fall, and they removed her through a basement window," says Blackwell.
Firefighters falling through floors in happening in newly constructed homes across the country. The problem, they say, is the manufactured floor support, which thanks to technology, is much different than it used to be.
"Our experience is the manufactured flooring systems do prematurely fail even after they've experienced a small volume or small duration of fire," says Blackwell.
This is becoming a fact of life for firefighters. They say this type of flooring construction is becoming more and more common. In fact it's now found in more than half of all new home construction.
They are constructed using engineered or pre-made components, and often held together with metal plates or adhesive.
One of these floors supported by a wood truss system belongs to Fire Battalion Chief Harry Fry.
"They're easy to put up, they're lighter, they're strong, but they don't hold up in direct flame," says Fry.
In response to growing concerns, there have been studies done about these floors. One study conducted by the Engineered Wood Association fire-tested pre-made supports called I-joists and compared them to traditional timber supports.
They burned in half the time. Part of the problem with the joists and trusses appears to be that they have more exposed surface area and less wood to burn.
"Once this type of construction is involved in direct flame contact, it's five minutes or less and we could have a serious collapse," says St. Charles Captain Dan Casey.
The National Wood Flooring Association based in Chesterfield says it's important for homeowners to know how their floors are supported.
"Your trusses, they let them go wider and longer spans without support and then you add a little bit thinner sub floor and thinner floor and someone's going to go through it quicker I would assume," says instructor Steve Seabaugh.
Still the materials are extremely popular. Builders say they're stable, lightweight and environmentally friendly.
"They're a better performing product, more durable product as far as building a home," says home builder Matt Belcher.
Belcher is also a former building inspector. He says he understands the firefighters concerns. He hopes local government will try harder to regulate their safety.
"The technology is growing so fast with these better built and more advanced products, the building codes are actually struggling to keep up a little bit," says Belcher.
For now firefighters are taking safety into their own hands.
"We have to adapt to what's around us," says Casey.
That means keeping rescue teams at the ready and using infrared cameras to look under the floors in new homes.
"That's why we go in with these thermal imagers. If we see that there's some flame involved in the truss construction, we know we've got to get out or get done what we're doing and evacuate," says Casey.
The victim in the St. Charles fire did not survive. Firefighters can't help but wonder if the outcome would have been different if the floor held up.
Is there a way to make your floor safer? One study found putting a layer of gypsum wallboard underneath the joists seemed to help. That floor held up for nearly 33 minutes in a controlled fire.
But each fire is different and unpredictable. Firefighters say the best thing you can do is have smoke detectors and an exit strategy.
Centers For Disease Control
& Prevention Offer Tips on Preventing Heat Related Illness
The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention
web site has tips on preventing heat related illness.
Click here for more information.
NIOSH Issues Respirator
The National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) has issued two User Notices regarding filtering facepiece
disposable N-95 respirators. IAFF recommendations on proper disposable
respirators for fire fighters and emergency response personnel are included
in our Avian
certificates of approval, TC-84A-4172 and TC-84A-4173, for the Crew, Inc.
Models RPN951 and RPN952 filtering facepiece respirators are null and
void. NIOSH is voiding these certificates of approval because there were
false and material misstatements in the applications submitted to NIOSH
for the approval of these respirators and these approvals should not have
been issued. The full user notice can be found here.
NIOSH has issued a user notice stating that
the Nano Guard N95
Particulate Respirator sold by 2HDistributors, is not certified and approved
by NIOSH. NIOSH states that this respirator is individually packaged and
improperly labeled with the NIOSH and Department of Health and Human Services
logos. Additionally, the label contains a NIOSH approval number, TC-84A-4175,
which was not issued to 2HDistributors. The full user notice can be found here.
Health and Safety....Heat Stress
We have included important information about heat
stress, including preventative measures fire fighters can take to avoid heat
injuries and keep hydrated.
Heat stress is an increase in human body temperature
and metabolism caused by physical exertion and/or a heated environment which
can lead to exhaustion, mental confusion, disorientation, dehydration, loss
of consciousness, heart attack, stroke and other fatal illnesses. Performing
strenuous tasks in the heated environment of a fire scene or in warm or humid
weather can also increase the risks of heat stress.
here for more information.
FDJC Captain Buscio"
Free Cardiac Screening for Firefighters
We are extremely fortunate that Donna Buscio and her family
have seen fit to share this program with all PFANJ members!
here for details!
Health & Safety Links
Protective Clothing and Equipment
Emergency Response Equipment
Fire Prevention Equipment
Additional Safety Concerns
|| Professional Firefighters Association of
AND SAFETY ALERT
PLEASE FIND A COMMUNICATION
JUST RECEIVED TODAY FROM THE NJ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES
PEOSH DIVISION, OUTLINING CRITICAL FIREFIGHTER HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES
RELATING TO THE USE OF CERTAIN "LAST CHANCE" PERSONAL ROPE BAIL
- OUT SYSTEMS." PLEASE BE ADVISED OF THIS INFORMATION PASSING IT
ALONG TO YOUR EMPLOYERS CONSIDERING SUCH PURCHASES. ANYONE RECEIVING THIS
MESSAGE PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHMENT FOR DOWNLOAD PURPOSES. SPECIFICALLY
THEY ARE LOOKING AT THOSE AFTER-MARKET SYSTEMS ATTACHING TO THE SCBA THAT
MAY EFFECT STANDARD, CERTIFICATION AND WARRANTY CRITERIA.
See the attached
file containing a letter from Heinz Ahlers, Acting Chief,
Technology Evaluation Branch, NPPTL.
Also, 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(2)(i)
states "The employer shall provide the
following respirators for employee use in an immediately dangerous to
or health (IDLH) atmospheres:" 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(2)(i)(A) states
"A full facepiece pressure demand SCBA certified by NIOSH for a minimum
service life of thirty five minutes". If an employer provides
a NIOSH approved SCBA with a last chance bail out system added to the
SCBA after it received approval from NIOSH, then the SCBAs NIOSH
approval would be void and the employer would be in violation of 29 CFR